New national study shows how climate change could affect Australia’s seafood industry


31 August 2026
Category:
  • Uncategorized

What does climate change mean for the future of fishing and aquaculture in Australia?

For people working in Australia’s seafood industry, climate change isn’t something that is happening somewhere else or sometime in the future. Ocean temperatures are changing, marine heatwaves are becoming more common, and the fish and other species we rely on are responding.

A study led by CSIRO researcher Dr Stephanie Brodie, has mapped climate change risk across Australia’s entire marine estate, from the Torres Strait to the waters around Macquarie Island.

The researchers looked at a range of changes that could affect seafood production, including warming oceans, marine heatwaves, ocean acidification, changing currents and productivity, and changes in rainfall and extreme heat.

So, what does this mean for fishing?

The study found that every part of Australia’s marine estate is exposed to some form of climate change, but the level of exposure varies from place to place.

Northern Australia, the Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait are among the areas expected to experience some of the greatest changes. Other areas, including parts of the Southern Ocean, are expected to experience less exposure to some climate hazards.

One of the biggest concerns is marine heatwaves.

Under a future where global temperatures reach 3°C above pre-industrial levels, the researchers estimate that heatwave conditions could last for an additional 237 days per year on average across Australia’s marine estate.

That doesn’t mean every fishing ground will be in a heatwave for 237 days. It means that, across the country, conditions that we currently consider extreme could become much more common and persistent.

The study also found that the amount of biomass available to fisheries is likely to decrease as warming increases. Across Australia’s marine estate, the average decline is estimated at around 2% under 1.5°C warming and 12% under 3°C warming, with some areas potentially experiencing much larger declines.

For a fisherman, these changes could mean different species in familiar fishing grounds, changes in when and where fish are available, lesspredictable seasons, and greater pressure on the businesses and communities that depend on fishing.

Importantly, the researchers aren’t saying that the future of Australian fishing is already decided.

Instead, this assessment gives us information that can help fisheries, industry and governments prepare for the changes ahead.

There are already examples of this happening across Australia. Fishers and aquaculture operators are adapting by changing where and when they operate, diversifying the species they target or farm, developing new markets and using better forecasts to plan around changing conditions. Check out Sea Change Australia’s Adaptation Stories for more examples.

The researchers identify three broad ways we can respond:

  • Reduce exposure – for example, changing where or when fishing occurs when conditions are unfavourable.
  • Reduce sensitivity – for example, diversifying species, markets or income sources.
  • Build adaptive capacity – making fisheries management more flexible so it can respond as conditions change.

At Sea Change Australia, we work with seafood communities to understand what climate change means for the people who depend on the ocean and, importantly, what we can do about it.

Research like this helps put individual experiences of changing conditions into a much bigger picture. It can help us understand where the greatest challenges are likely to occur and where we need to focus adaptation efforts.

The full study, Climate Vulnerability of Australian Seafood Systems: A National Assessment of Exposure and Adaptive Capacity, is open access in Fisheries Oceanography.

Figure (from Brodie et al 2026): Marine regions within Australia’s exclusive economic zone (left). Map of the footprint of state and commonwealth fisheries in waters off mainland Australia, showing the number of gear types used (right). Data span the years of 2011–2015 and are aggregated to 1°x1°. Gear types used vary among regions and can include Danish seine, hand collection, hand net, demersal longline, pelagic longline, minor line, demersal net, pelagic net, pot and trap, purse seine and demersal trawl. Regions excluded: Norfolk Island as there is currently no commercial fishing; Cocos (Keeling) and Christmas Island data were not available; and fisheries data from sub-Antarctic islands are confidential. Data from SeaMap Australia at https://seamapaustralia.org/map/#. Regions are informed by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) marine bioregions and include coastal waters and territorial islands.
Figure (From Brodie et al 2026): Cumulative exposure to climate hazards across three global warming levels. Exposure is the normalised sum of oceanic climate hazard anomalies relative to the current period. Bottom right: Exposure averaged for each region and global warming level. Some region names shortened to facilitate visualisation (NW = north-west, GBR and TS = Great Barrier Reef and Torres Strait, Heard Isl. = Heard and McDonald Islands).

Sea Change Australia uses cookies to deliver content that’s relevant to you. We rely on cookies to remember your preferences, provide personalised content, and to analyse our website traffic. You consent to our cookies if you click “Accept”. Please refer to our privacy policy for more information.